Somebody quoted youa statistic.Where is it from?
This category runs on numbers that nobody has traced. Each of these takes one of them back to the primary source and prints what is actually there: the publisher, the year, the sample, and what that publisher sells. Sometimes the number holds up. Sometimes it turns out to be measuring something else entirely.
Writing the first one is how we found out our own homepage was leaving out a disclosure. That correction is in it.
Nobody has measured dental case acceptance
Every case acceptance benchmark in circulation (34%, 42%, 45%, 46%, 47%, 61%, 75-80%) was published by somebody selling the fix. The one independently funded measurement we could find reports 78%, and the gap is a denominator, not your patients.
Read it
What a franchise broker actually earns, from the one filing that has to say
The franchise industry quotes $18,000 to $25,000 per closed deal. That range was never measured by anybody. Two sources with opposite incentives put the real figure around $35,000, and only one of them was legally obliged to tell you.
Read it
The only audited lead conversion rate in home services is legally sealed
A federal regulator subpoenaed a lead seller's own conversion data, found the published rates could not be substantiated, and redacted the real numbers as confidential. Meanwhile the market leader's audited filings put the average lead at $25 to $33, not $50 to $150.
Read it
The speed-to-lead study everyone quotes, and the line in it nobody quotes
Every firm in this category cites the same 2011 Harvard Business Review paper. We cite it too. Here is its actual sample, what it actually measured, and the author disclosure that almost nobody prints, including us until this week.
Read it
A missed call does not cost you $1,200
The figure every automation vendor quotes at contractors is the value of the job, not the value of the call. The difference is your booking rate, and correcting it out loud is worth more than the bigger number.
Read it
An entire industry is quoting a 2018 report as if it were current
Executive search has two numbers it repeats about itself. Both come from a benchmark report that was republished with different figures. We had them wrong on this site too, until we checked the edition.
Read it
Every article names its source and what that source sells. If one of them is wrong, it is checkable, which is the entire point. Why we publish this way.