Who is actually building this

Three people,no client list,and a standardyou can check.

Automation Experience is a small firm that designs, builds and owns the operational systems a business runs on. This page is the part most sites in this category fill with logos we have not earned, so it does something else instead: it tells you who we are, what we will not do, and where to go and check that we mean it.

The team
Three people, named, with their responsibilities written down
Published in full
Seventy delivery playbooks, one per system per trade
Client results published
None, because none have been verified yet
How you reach us
One named person by email, not a shared inbox or a bot
The operating team

Three owners,distinct responsibilities.

Small enough that the person who scoped your build is the person who reviews it. Each of the three owns a named part of the promise, and you will deal with all of them.

Kazim Raza Meer, Founder at Automation Experience

Founder

Kazim Raza Meer

Kazim brings direct-response discipline to operations work: find the constraint that is actually costing money, then build the smallest system that can credibly remove it. He decides what we sell, what we turn down, and what a sentence on this site has to be backed by before it can be published.

  • Positioning and offer
  • Direction
  • Commercial standards
Agha Rakhshani, Chief Operating Officer at Automation Experience

Chief Operating Officer

Agha Rakhshani

Agha turns that direction into an operating plan: scope, sequence, quality review, and the handoffs that move a build from an idea into something your team can run on a Monday morning. During delivery he is the person you actually deal with.

  • Operations and delivery
  • Quality assurance
  • Client coordination
Zorain Baloch, Automation Specialist at Automation Experience

Automation Specialist

Zorain Baloch

Zorain owns the technical path between the tools: routing, integrations, exception logic, measurement, and the exact points where a system has to stop and hand control back to a trained person. Most of what is drawn on the seventy system pages is his to build.

  • Workflow architecture
  • Integrations
  • Human escalation paths
Why this exists

Almost nobody loses acustomer all at once.

They lose the next step. An enquiry waits. A call is missed at nine on a Saturday. A quote goes out and nobody owns the follow-up. A cancellation leaves a slot that was already paid for. A customer who came four times a year comes three, and nobody notices for eleven months.

Every tool in the building records a fragment of that, and none of them records the decision that stopped. So the owner reconstructs the week from memory, and the answer to “what did we lose” is always an estimate.

Mission

Turn the disconnected moments in an established service business into one owned, measurable path from first enquiry through to repeat work.

Vision

A business where the software carries the context, the team owns the exceptions, and nothing is lost quietly in the gap between two systems.

Operating standards, not wall art

Good automation makesresponsibility clearer.

Speed matters. Context, consent, ownership and escalation matter more. Every build we ship is judged on how well those four work together, and these are the four rules that decide it.

  1. Start where the work stops moving.

    A system earns its place only when it makes the next step clearer, faster, or more visible to the person who owns it. Not when it adds a dashboard.

  2. Keep the handoff to a person visible.

    Sensitive, ambiguous and judgement calls belong to people. The system routes them and escalates them on a timer. It does not quietly absorb them.

  3. Show the owner what stopped.

    Activity is not progress. We build around ownership, exceptions, and the decision that stopped moving, because that is the thing nobody can currently see.

  4. Earn proof before publishing it.

    No invented reviews, client names, screenshots, ratings or performance claims. Evidence reaches this website after permission and verification, or it does not reach it.

Check it rather than trust it

We have no results to showyou yet. This instead.

Every other firm in this category would put a logo wall here. We do not have one that is honestly ours, so here are four things you can verify on this site in about ten seconds each. If any of them is not true, you will know before you speak to us.

We publish the delivery playbook, not a summary of it.

Seventy pages carry the actual build order for a system: every step, the escalation windows, the triage ladder, the stop rules, and the phase where it still runs with a person approving each message. Competitors publish a features list.

Read one in full

Every figure carries its denominator.

Publisher, year, sample, and what the publisher sells. Where the sample is not published, the page says that too, rather than implying one. The custom builders page states plainly that its source does not publish how many firms responded.

See a cited figure

Five of the ten industry pages carry no figure at all.

Under a heading that reads "No number here, on purpose". The available statistics for those trades came from vendors selling the solution, with no traceable sample, so the pages say so instead of borrowing one.

See a page with no number

We corrected our own headline number in public.

The 123-day, 71% pair that the executive search industry quotes is the 2018 edition of a report republished with different figures. The page prints the current 117 days and 76%, and explains the error rather than quietly using the better number.

Read the correction

The boundaries

Four things wewill not build.

These are on every system page too, taken from the delivery document rather than written for a website. A supplier who has not thought about them will not raise them, and you would find out later.

Decisions that need a licence.

Nothing clinical, nothing legal, nothing that determines candidacy or diagnosis. The system organises approved information and routes it to the person qualified to decide.

Messaging people who never agreed to it.

No purchased or scraped lists. Consent is recorded per number with its date, its source and its wording, and quiet hours run in the recipient's local time rather than yours.

Proof we have not earned.

No client names, logos, screenshots or results until they are real, attributable and permissioned. That is why this page has none of them.

Replacing software that already works.

We build inside the platform you run. If a system needs a record your platform does not hold, we add the field to your platform rather than starting a second one beside it.

Plainly, before you ask

Who actuallypicks up.

There is no contact form that goes nowhere and no chat widget answered by a script. Delivery runs on your working hours, every message the systems send is timed to your customers’ local time rather than to ours, and the person coordinating your build is one of the three named above.

Ask a question
agha@automationexperience.netAgha Rakhshani, COO. A person, not a shared inbox.
Start properly
The fourteen-question applicationAbout seven minutes. No price, no purchase, no call unless you ask.
Read the detail first
All ten trades and seventy systemsThe whole delivery playbook, published, before you talk to anyone.

Judge the work,not the promises.

On the call we look at what is actually costing you most right now, and whether the first system is worth building at all. If there is nothing worth building yet, we will tell you that instead of selling you something.

Fourteen questions, about seven minutes. No price, no purchase, and nobody calls you unless you ask them to.

Application1 / 14

Next question: where we send what we prepare.